DEMODEMO graph: 51 sample follows. Not anyone's real X following. X does not give Mila that graph without OAuth.

Fingerprint v2.1

@attn_paper

Sofia Racz · researcher · EU

Attention mechanisms, memory, long context. I cite the 2017 paper so you don't have to pretend.

Open on X

Followers

19,800

Posts / day

1.9

Active months

90d growth

How they post

Scores from 0 to 1. Higher density and citations = more signal. Farm score is how robotic the posting looks — not a court verdict.

Information density0.87

Citation rate0.81

Substantive replies0.72

Technical depth0.86

Originality0.59

Explanatory depth0.84

composite 0.79

Spam check

farm 0.06 · looks humanno coordination flags

Timing entropy: 0.71
Cadence regularity: 0.32
Duplication: 0.09
Follow churn: 0.06
Promo frequency: 0.04
CTA patterns: 0

Uncalibrated heuristic. Inputs: cadence regularity, timing entropy, duplication, follow churn, promo frequency. No labeled precision/recall/Brier. Not a verdict. Not grounds to punish an account.

Network

Communities: ai-research · ml-research

bridge_score 0.33

Topics

ml0.88
ai0.82
math0.33

Why this person — source posts

INDEXED SAMPLE posts. Internal ids, snapshot time, quoted text. These are not live X permalinks.

“Scaled dot-product attention is still the load-bearing sentence. Everything after is systems work.”
id attn_paper-1 · original · created 2026-09-16T11:57:00Z · retrieved 2026-09-17T22:00:00Z · source indexed · cites Vaswani et al. 2017 · no live permalink

Signed receipt

This is Mila's file on @attn_paper — a hash, not a vibe. You don't need the raw JSON. Open them on X, or copy the file if you're auditing.

sha256:3810c1dc